It 'possible that the intervention of the Supreme Court to require municipal, provincial and regional legal behavior? Why
regions, provinces and municipalities continue to violate the law? Why
municipalities, provinces and regions continue to implement actions whose goal is the robbery of the citizens?
not have money? Li
must claim by the State central administration. the implementation of criminal actions by municipalities, provinces and regions to extort money from citizens are real acts of terrorism and as such should be punished. With
sentence no 680 of 13 January 2011 the Supreme Court shall act as a citizen which leads to a road could not see the sign that indicated the presence of an electronic camera as the camera was not properly reported.
says the Supreme Court in Case No. 680/2011:
"manifestly well-founded are the arguments contained in the following two reasons, given that the opponent had expressly raised in the application and not just assumed (as opines the court of appeal), that he had placed on the from a provincial highway (the "(----)") and had not encountered any sign reporting the subsequent presence of the safety camera. In that context it was not, therefore, sufficient to ascertain the existence of a unique and any premonitory sign on the highway because they need to verify but, in keeping with the aims pursued by the provisions of article. 4 cit. DL, because the warning could be considered effective (as later confirmed by DM August 15, 2007, Art. 2) the presence of specific and reasonable distance, the above intersection and subsequent fixed location of speed detection, the burden of proof In the absence of confirmation in this regard fidefacente contained in the minutes, hung on the administration side, it is a condition of the lawfulness of the alleged punitive. "
I am not a citizen I have to prove my innocence, but the municipal government, provincial or regional level that have to prove their legitimacy in the execution of that measure.
The transparency of administrative acts for the administrator to not giving effect to the criminal acts playing on his knowledge of the rules against the citizens who, for one reason or another, are not aware of these rules.
municipalities, often occupied by people fearful and servile, rather than demanding the state that is necessary to the proper administration, jackals prefer sanctions citizens with real actions robbery.
The cameras are popping up like mushrooms at every street corner e i cittadini che sono costretti a viaggiare sono le vittime inconsapevoli di questi atti di rapina. Perché non si impone ai costruttori di automobili il divieto di costruire automobili che superino certi limiti di velocità? Perché se lo Stato lo facesse limiterebbe le possibilità dei cittadini di cadere in quelle trappole che permette allo Stato di giustificare la sua attività di rapina: come per le lotterie e i giochi d’azzardo. Per i liquori e le droghe: lo stato perseguita il singolo individuo, ma favorisce massicciamente la diffusione dell’alcool e delle droghe. Persegue penalmente delitti di cui egli favorisce la commissione.
E’ il sintomo di una società malata in cui la Corte di Cassazione tenta di mettere order defining the behavior and reported as part of constitutional legality.
After Fascist Italy has experienced two decades of the ferocity Democrat and now lives Craxi and Berlusconi and the two decades piduista. All three teens were characterized by institutional violence against the constitution came as a reaction to the fascist period and raped by democrats and piduisti of Silvio Berlusconi. It will take another
Piazzale Loreto to restore constitutional legality?
Puoddarsi meantime, however, the Court of Cassation and the Constitutional Court, among many difficulties and many contradictions, are attempting to establish a social order more consistent than their constitutional requirements of the safety camera and this is another bold choice.
indicated below for the entire sentence. Join
circuit religious thought, social, economic and ethical the pagan religion!
March 5, 2011
Claudio Simeoni
Sorcerer's Apprentice Mechanic
Guardian Antichrist
P.le Parmesan, 8
30175 - Venezia Marghera
Tel 3277862784 e-mail claudiosimeoni@libero.it
regions, provinces and municipalities continue to violate the law? Why
municipalities, provinces and regions continue to implement actions whose goal is the robbery of the citizens?
not have money? Li
must claim by the State central administration. the implementation of criminal actions by municipalities, provinces and regions to extort money from citizens are real acts of terrorism and as such should be punished. With
sentence no 680 of 13 January 2011 the Supreme Court shall act as a citizen which leads to a road could not see the sign that indicated the presence of an electronic camera as the camera was not properly reported.
says the Supreme Court in Case No. 680/2011:
"manifestly well-founded are the arguments contained in the following two reasons, given that the opponent had expressly raised in the application and not just assumed (as opines the court of appeal), that he had placed on the from a provincial highway (the "(----)") and had not encountered any sign reporting the subsequent presence of the safety camera. In that context it was not, therefore, sufficient to ascertain the existence of a unique and any premonitory sign on the highway because they need to verify but, in keeping with the aims pursued by the provisions of article. 4 cit. DL, because the warning could be considered effective (as later confirmed by DM August 15, 2007, Art. 2) the presence of specific and reasonable distance, the above intersection and subsequent fixed location of speed detection, the burden of proof In the absence of confirmation in this regard fidefacente contained in the minutes, hung on the administration side, it is a condition of the lawfulness of the alleged punitive. "
I am not a citizen I have to prove my innocence, but the municipal government, provincial or regional level that have to prove their legitimacy in the execution of that measure.
The transparency of administrative acts for the administrator to not giving effect to the criminal acts playing on his knowledge of the rules against the citizens who, for one reason or another, are not aware of these rules.
municipalities, often occupied by people fearful and servile, rather than demanding the state that is necessary to the proper administration, jackals prefer sanctions citizens with real actions robbery.
The cameras are popping up like mushrooms at every street corner e i cittadini che sono costretti a viaggiare sono le vittime inconsapevoli di questi atti di rapina. Perché non si impone ai costruttori di automobili il divieto di costruire automobili che superino certi limiti di velocità? Perché se lo Stato lo facesse limiterebbe le possibilità dei cittadini di cadere in quelle trappole che permette allo Stato di giustificare la sua attività di rapina: come per le lotterie e i giochi d’azzardo. Per i liquori e le droghe: lo stato perseguita il singolo individuo, ma favorisce massicciamente la diffusione dell’alcool e delle droghe. Persegue penalmente delitti di cui egli favorisce la commissione.
E’ il sintomo di una società malata in cui la Corte di Cassazione tenta di mettere order defining the behavior and reported as part of constitutional legality.
After Fascist Italy has experienced two decades of the ferocity Democrat and now lives Craxi and Berlusconi and the two decades piduista. All three teens were characterized by institutional violence against the constitution came as a reaction to the fascist period and raped by democrats and piduisti of Silvio Berlusconi. It will take another
Piazzale Loreto to restore constitutional legality?
Puoddarsi meantime, however, the Court of Cassation and the Constitutional Court, among many difficulties and many contradictions, are attempting to establish a social order more consistent than their constitutional requirements of the safety camera and this is another bold choice.
indicated below for the entire sentence. Join
circuit religious thought, social, economic and ethical the pagan religion!
March 5, 2011
Claudio Simeoni
Sorcerer's Apprentice Mechanic
Guardian Antichrist
P.le Parmesan, 8
30175 - Venezia Marghera
Tel 3277862784 e-mail claudiosimeoni@libero.it
Supreme Court
SECTION VI CIVIL
Order of January 13, 2011, No 680
Conduct process - Reasons for Decision
Councillor appointed to the preliminary examination filed the report, dated 9.6.10, art. 380 bis cpc which is transcribed below.
CIRCUMSTANCES:
that the appeal concerns a ruling that, in the reform of First Instance issued by the local justice of the peace, accepting the appeal brought by the above-mentioned communication, rejected the opposition under Article. 204 CdS in a rel. L. No 689 of 1981, Art. 22, against a verbal notification of the infringement of Article administrative. 142 cit. cod., paragraph 8 verified by an electronic camera equipment, among other things, and in particular believing that failure to indicate in the report of the presence of the sign prior notice of the presence of the device (which would have been assessed by inspection by the first judge) did not affect the validity of the complaint and that, moreover, in this case, the opponent does not had indicated, even before "check out his path," the "path" of origin, according to the alleged absence of signs on the stretch of road actually committed;
NOTES:
claim is manifestly unfounded in the first order plea as the second and third, like the following relevant considerations:
1A mot. viol. and false appl. No DL 121, Art. 4, conv. in L. No 168, 2002 and L. No 241 of 1990, Art. 3). The case law cited by the applicant (Cass. 12833/07, which must be added later, and in accordance with Cass. 7419/09), while affirming the need for the validity of the verbal notification of the presence of signs of prior information to motorists in transit, does not require, however, that this fact also, on pain of nullity, as indicated in the minutes, failing that, therefore, an express provision to that effect and in consideration of the principle of mandatory nature of the nullity of the proceedings, not criticized the statement of principle subject of legal remedy that has no place in question the mandatory information in question, so that when its compliance has been established or admitted, however, the lack of explicit mention of the existence of the warning signs in the verbal notification does not undermine its validity, nor can it be relied upon in contrary to the principle of "transparency" administrative measures, taking into account the facilitating verifiable about the condition in question. 2A and 3A
reason (or false viol. appl. Art. 115 CCP, art. 2697 cc and DL n. 117, art. 3, paragraph 1 letter. Conv. In Law No. 160 of 2007, insufficient motivation) .
are clearly based the allegations contained in the following two reasons, given that the opponent in the application had expressly raised and not just assumed (as questionable appeal court), that he had entered on a provincial highway (the "(****)") and had not encountered any sign reporting the presence of the next ' cameras. In that context it was not, therefore, sufficient to ascertain the existence of a unique and any premonitory sign on the highway because they need to verify but, in keeping with the aims pursued by the provisions of article. 4 cit. DL, because the warning could be considered effective (as later confirmed by DM August 15, 2007, Art. 2) the presence of specific and reasonable distance, the above intersection and the subsequent stationary detection rate, the burden of proof, in the absence of attestation fidefacente contained in the record in this regard, incumbent on the administration side, it is a condition for the legitimacy of the claim penalties.
The remaining grounds, formulated only in the alternative by the applicant, are absorbed. It is proposed, in conclusion, rejecting the first ground, the acceptance of the second and third absorption of the remaining and the cassation court of appeal ruling.
the above, it is not part of the pleadings were filed, or made comments audience, sharing the college in full the reasons for the proposal of the rapporteur, shall in accordance with, demandando al giudice di rinvio il regolamento delle spese de presente giudizio.
P.Q.M.
LA CORTE rigetta il primo motivo di ricorso,accoglie il secondo ed il terzo cassa la sentenza impugnata in relazione alle censure accolte e rinvia, anche per le spese del presente giudizio, al Tribunale di Acqui Terme in persona di diverso magistrato
