Ancora una volta la Corte di Cassazione sentenzia contro il delirio di onnipotenza del dio padrone cristiano legittimando il diritto all’indignazione dei cittadini per le ingiustizie o i torti, veri o presunti, subiti. E’ possibile che sia necessario l’intervento SEMPRE della Corte Costituzionale?
citizens are indignant and condemn them to the judge some indignation: it is always an act of terrorism enacted by that judge. The laws must be respected, not just those that come in handy. Just in Case No.
7073 of 23 February 2011 the Supreme Court declared non-punishable as a worker, already condemned by the justice of the peace, declare that the Justice of the Peace
"should have considered: a) whether the conduct of persons defamed integrates an unjust and then the details of the provocation, b) if the conduct of the applicant could be seen as a reaction to this unjust act, c) if resorted to the requirement of immediacy, given that (...) it is not necessary that the reaction is carried out at the same time when the offense is received, it is sufficient if it takes place until the hard state of anger aroused by the provocative fact, in noting that nothing has spent time, when the delay in the reaction is solely depended on the nature and specific requirements of the instruments used for twisting the offense. "
In essence, the Supreme Court, ruling in 7073 of 23 February 2011 reaffirmed the right state of anger thing is denied the ideology of master god of the Christians from the case comes from the absolutism of the Christian god lord.
Unfortunately, all too often identify themselves with the judges the criminal on the cross that the Ministry of Justice, in order to abuse the Constitution of the Republic, requires courts to replace the constitutional requirements. The right
indignation is a sacred right in our Constitution, even though those that provoke indignation, increasingly identify with the Christian master god and believe that people are not bearers of constitutional rights, but you should put on their knees before them .
What provoked the indignation of the worker who offended with phrases written on leaflets that the company resorted to the court for slander?
This is a person, an employee who was fired because he has been a complaint false light in which he was accused of sexual harassment. At the time of dismissal, the company had promised him an alternative job. Only that the company has not kept the promise made and this has aroused the anger of the workers who carried out the flyers in the abstract phrases insulting against a company that had become his master and god thought of not having to keep his word date.
People are not cattle kneel before the god Christian master. They are the subjects of constitutional law. Rights that must always be respected especially when the person who claims the rights is socially and psychologically weaker and more fragile.
Log in the circuit of religious thought, social, economic and ethical the pagan religion!
March 1, 2011
Claudio Simeoni
Sorcerer's Apprentice Mechanic
Guardian Antichrist
P.le Parmesan, 8
30175 - Venezia Marghera
Tel 3277862784 e-mail claudiosimeoni@libero.it
citizens are indignant and condemn them to the judge some indignation: it is always an act of terrorism enacted by that judge. The laws must be respected, not just those that come in handy. Just in Case No.
7073 of 23 February 2011 the Supreme Court declared non-punishable as a worker, already condemned by the justice of the peace, declare that the Justice of the Peace
"should have considered: a) whether the conduct of persons defamed integrates an unjust and then the details of the provocation, b) if the conduct of the applicant could be seen as a reaction to this unjust act, c) if resorted to the requirement of immediacy, given that (...) it is not necessary that the reaction is carried out at the same time when the offense is received, it is sufficient if it takes place until the hard state of anger aroused by the provocative fact, in noting that nothing has spent time, when the delay in the reaction is solely depended on the nature and specific requirements of the instruments used for twisting the offense. "
In essence, the Supreme Court, ruling in 7073 of 23 February 2011 reaffirmed the right state of anger thing is denied the ideology of master god of the Christians from the case comes from the absolutism of the Christian god lord.
Unfortunately, all too often identify themselves with the judges the criminal on the cross that the Ministry of Justice, in order to abuse the Constitution of the Republic, requires courts to replace the constitutional requirements. The right
indignation is a sacred right in our Constitution, even though those that provoke indignation, increasingly identify with the Christian master god and believe that people are not bearers of constitutional rights, but you should put on their knees before them .
What provoked the indignation of the worker who offended with phrases written on leaflets that the company resorted to the court for slander?
This is a person, an employee who was fired because he has been a complaint false light in which he was accused of sexual harassment. At the time of dismissal, the company had promised him an alternative job. Only that the company has not kept the promise made and this has aroused the anger of the workers who carried out the flyers in the abstract phrases insulting against a company that had become his master and god thought of not having to keep his word date.
People are not cattle kneel before the god Christian master. They are the subjects of constitutional law. Rights that must always be respected especially when the person who claims the rights is socially and psychologically weaker and more fragile.
Log in the circuit of religious thought, social, economic and ethical the pagan religion!
March 1, 2011
Claudio Simeoni
Sorcerer's Apprentice Mechanic
Guardian Antichrist
P.le Parmesan, 8
30175 - Venezia Marghera
Tel 3277862784 e-mail claudiosimeoni@libero.it
0 comments:
Post a Comment